Skip to main content

Snapchat Has the Power


Related image


Image result for pointless snapchat streaks


Image result for pointless snapchat streaks

12/10/18

We all know the power of social media. The ability to pull in users and not let them go. We as a society have been sucked into a whole other world where our life simply disappears, and all that matters is what we see on a screen. Snapchat, a billion dollar company truly has expert tactics and techniques to pull teens specifically into their world and keep them captive.

One tool that snapchat uses, are snapstreaks. "Streaks" are essentially a number beside a name of a person who you snapchat everyday. The number increases every day you snapchat them, and if you don't snapchat the person, then you lose it. Although these streaks really are just a number on a screen, people have become so engulfed in them, thinking they are important, myself included. The point of social media including snapchat should be to talk to people and show them what you are doing or have a more interactive conversation with using your face instead of just texting with no visuals. However, streaks have truly destroyed this purpose and have redefined it.

Many people now just send pictures of a black screen saying "streaks", just so that they can keep it. They make no real conversation or show anything of interest. It is astonishing how many streaks people have with others whom they have never met nor encountered. We form "relationships" based off of these pointless attempts by the media to keep us attached to the phone. We have become so dependent on the media, that we have to go back every day at least. There is this obsession with a false sense of relationships, and people become more likely to have conversations over media and less likely to have face to face interactions.

The real life world does not function like this. We should not be encouraging teenagers to think that this is the right way to approach life and technology. Mass corporations do not care about the society, they care about how to benefit their company.

In addition, snapchat has a feature called snapmaps which allows people to see others location as well as when they are on the app. This feature can be turned off, but is that not too far? An invasion of privacy? A potential competition between teenagers? Social media has essentially become a competition between teenagers and whose life is best.

The impact that social media is having on our society, specifically the younger generations seems only to be detrimental. We must be aware and more proactive of providing a better future. It starts with these mass corporations and how they present their product, but it also falls upon us to be cognizant and resist these temptations. 

Sources:
https://www.webhostingsecretrevealed.net/blog/web-business-ideas/how-does-snapchat-make-money/
https://phys.org/news/2018-06-snapchat.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Teenage Smoker

1/5/19 Recently, I have been noticing an increase in anti-smoking commercials. What I have wondered is how this influx of smoking ads is affecting the teenage population. At first I thought they may work in turning our population away from smoking which some researchers believe is the case, however IFLScience conducted a study that expressed otherwise. The way this was done was by taking 441 kids from the ages of 11-17 and sent them into a fake store. In this store for some was anti-smoking advertisements. For others there was none. When asked before and then after the visit into the store, the survey results showed that those who were already at risk for smoking were more likely to smoke after seeing the advertisements. I thought this was strange at first, however I know now how it makes sense. When looking at the current habits and characteristics of a teenager we can explain many consumer patterns. Teenagers are engulfed in this idea of scandalous activity. Of wanting to do wha...

Vox versus Fox

12/4/18 The current crisis on the border between Mexico and the United States is simply atrocious, and the way that two different sources approach it is dramatically different. I analyzed two sources on opposite sides of the spectrum, Vox which lies on the left, and fox which lies on the right. There was definitely a distinction in the words used by each of the news websites, and these word choices are meant to convince and appeal to the audience. In Vox I found many patterns or categories of words that were repeatedly brought up. For example, words that made the situation more victimized, words that show how people have been assaulted and hurt. They appeal to the peoples sympathy and show the suffering of others. Some words are, "violence, desperation, frustration, force, unrest," and many more. With these words we associate a certain picture of suffering which gets the reader to tap into their more sympathetic feelings and project their emotional connection...

Guns, Left and Right

12/2/18 In the near past leading up to our current day events, there is much controversy and debate around the issue of gun control and how to address the problem. This topic constantly circulates around the media and the difference of approaches between the left or right, or two sources is very visible and shows how each piece is meant to affect you or pull you in. The first piece I analyzed was of the Washington Post which is a source that edges more to the left. The first thing I noticed was a non-aggressive attack to the opposition. " Those who oppose reforms say nothing can be done. That's demonstrably wrong."  A thing that I found is that more harsh words were used. "D emonstrably wrong,  notoriously underfunded, massacre, slaughter,  more dangerous ." This blatant harshness and avoidance of doublespeak is to show the reader how serious this issue is. In addition that this is something that has a great effect and must be addressed, and that the ...